Engineers love O‑rings for good reasons: they’re compact, inexpensive, easy to source, and, when used correctly, extremely reliable. But in cryogenic, vacuum or high pressure, high‑purity, and aggressive‑chemistry environments, even the best FFKM or FKM O‑ring can run into physics that it can’t beat: loss of resilience at low temperature, outgassing and particle limits, extrusion under pressure at elevated temperature, or friction and wear during dynamic duty. In those edge cases, a spring‑energized seal (SES) delivers a measurable step‑up in reliability, cleanliness, and lifecycle performance.

This guide explains how spring‑energized seals work, where O‑rings start to struggle, and provides a decision framework to tell you when to keep O‑rings, and when to upgrade to SES. You’ll also find design tips and internal links to Canyon Components resources for materials, compliance, and application engineering.

This guide explains how spring‑energized seals work, where O‑rings start to struggle, and provides a decision framework to tell you when to keep O‑rings—and when to upgrade to SES. — This guide explains how spring‑energized seals work, where O‑rings start to struggle, and provides a decision framework to tell you when to keep O‑rings, and when to upgrade to SES.

Useful references as you read:

How spring‑energized seals work (and why they win at the extremes)

A spring‑energized seal couples a thermoplastic jacket, most often PTFE (virgin or filled), PEEK, or other engineered fluoropolymers, with a metal energizer spring. The spring provides constant contact force against the mating surfaces even when temperature swings, pressure cycles, or the media would otherwise cause a conventional elastomer to lose resilience. The jacket provides exceptional chemical resistance, low friction, very low outgassing/particle shed, and dimensional stability at temperatures where elastomers soften, embrittle, or outgas.

How spring‑energized seals work (and why they win at the extremes)

Jacket choices

PTFE (virgin): Ultra‑low friction, excellent purity, outstanding chemical resistance; best for clean vacuum and aggressive media.
Filled PTFE (glass, carbon, bronze): Improves wear, creep, and extrusion resistance in reciprocating or high‑pressure environments.
PEEK/PEK: Higher modulus and temperature capability; used for extreme wear/extrusion control and when mechanical strength dominates.

Why SES excel: Cryogenic resilience (spring holds force at cold start), low outgassing for vacuum and semiconductor, broader chemical window than any elastomer family, and higher PV capability for demanding dynamics.

Where O‑rings start to struggle

Cryogenic / deep cold: At low enough temperatures, even low‑temp elastomers lose rebound; contact stress collapses at startup.
Vacuum / ultra‑clean: Outgassing and particles may exceed tool limits for optics/semiconductor.
Dynamic duty in aggressive media: Swell + friction + wear can accelerate failure.
High pressure + temperature cycling: Modulus drops at heat; extrusion risk rises despite backups.
Compressed gas & decompression: RGD/AED risk remains; cold makes seals more fragile.

Quick comparison: SES vs O‑rings

Attribute	O‑rings (elastomer)	Spring‑energized seals
Temperature band	Excellent within rated band; resilience falls near Tg	Very wide; spring maintains load through cold start/heat soak
Chemical resistance	Compound dependent (FKM/FFKM/FVMQ, etc.)	PTFE/PEEK jackets handle broader chemistries
Outgassing/particles	Low–moderate	Very low; ideal for vacuum/semiconductor/optics
Dynamics & wear	Good in moderate regimes with proper lube/groove	Filled PTFE + springs enable higher PV and smoother friction
Extrusion control	Backup rings help; still elastomeric	High‑modulus jacket resists extrusion; spring keeps line load
Unit cost	Lower	Higher (offset by uptime & risk reduction)

Decision framework: keep O‑rings or upgrade to SES?

Stay with O‑rings when

Temperature range is moderate.
Media are compatible; cleanliness needs are modest.
Dynamics are mild; extrusion is controlled with backup rings.
Cost sensitivity is extreme and leaks would be merely inconvenient.

Upgrade to SES when

Cryogenic or vacuum conditions require force at cold start and ultra‑low outgassing.
Aggressive chemistries attack elastomers; PTFE/PEEK is safer.
High PV dynamics call for low friction and predictable line load.
Pressure + heat cycling drives extrusion/relaxation beyond O‑ring limits.
RGD/AED risks persist even with best elastomer grades.

If you’re on the fence, prototype both: a Canrez® FFKM O‑ring configuration and a PTFE‑jacket SES in the same interface. Canyon can support A/B trials with material testing and clean packaging.

Material selection for SES jackets and energizers

Jacket materials

Virgin PTFE - ultra‑clean/static; lowest friction.
Filled PTFE - wear/extrusion resistance in dynamic/high‑pressure duty.
PEEK - highest mechanical strength for severe gaps or high PV.

Spring materials

Elgiloy®/Cobalt alloys - stable force across wide temperatures; corrosion resistant.
Inconel®/Hastelloy® - hot oxidizers and harsher chemistries.
Stainless 301/302/316 - general use where chemistry allows.

Practical design guidance

Define the extremes: true min/max temperature, pressure cycles, velocity, media transitions.
Choose the energizer: V‑spring for vacuum/cryo; helical for smooth dynamics; canted coil for broad deflection.
Tune the jacket: virgin PTFE for clean/static; filled PTFE for wear; PEEK for extreme PV.
Machining & finish: SES grooves are not O‑ring grooves; verify clearances and radii as noted on the SES page.
Thermal & vacuum: consider thermal contraction mismatch; pre‑bake and bag‑in‑bag via cleanroom packaging.
Lubrication: if allowable, use a low‑volatility, compatible lube (external lubrication); otherwise design for dry friction.
Qualification testing: leak at cold start; PV and wear; thermal cycling; media soaks; decompression if gas is involved, Canyon can help set up via testing.

Case snapshots

Cryogenic sampling valve (LNG): O‑rings leaked at cold start; SES with V‑spring sealed immediately, no warm‑up needed.
Semiconductor etch chamber: Particle excursions with dynamic O‑rings; filled‑PTFE SES improved MTBA and yield.
Hot solvent reciprocating pump: O‑ring extrusion despite backups; PEEK‑jacket SES with canted coil stabilized seal force.
Sour‑gas let‑downs: AED‑rated O‑rings still sensitive to ramp; SES provided wider safe decompression window.

Cost & ROI

SES unit price is higher than O‑rings, but in cryogenic, vacuum, aggressive media, or high‑PV dynamics, SES commonly pays back within one or two maintenance cycles by eliminating warm‑up delays, extending intervals, and reducing contamination‑driven rejects.

How to engage Canyon

Share your envelope (temperature, pressure, dynamics, media, cleanliness/compliance).
Send hardware prints, or we’ll capture them via reverse engineering.
Prototype both Canrez® FFKM O‑rings and SES for A/B comparison.
Decide with data, Canyon helps document results and finalize the spec.

Final takeaways

O-rings are excellent inside their envelope; use FFKM (e.g., Canrez, Kalrez®, Chemraz®) when heat and chemistry allow.
Spring-energized PTFE/PEEK seals take over when you need force at cryogenic start, ultra-low outgassing, plasma/chemical immunity, or high PV dynamics beyond elastomer limits.
Canyon Components supplies both, so your team can prototype quickly, measure the benefit, and standardize the most reliable, lowest-risk solution for the application.

aerospace seals Posts

Spring-Energized Seal vs O-Ring | When to Upgrade, Extreme Conditions